Brad McFeeters <archosauromorph2@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Sampson et al wrote, "All presently-described chasmosaurine
> species were included in the analysis, for a total of 18
> chasmosaurines." Does anyone know why _Medusaceratops_ and
> _Tatankaceratops_ were excluded?
And where's _Ceratops_???!!!!!
;-)