Rescued from truncation:
> That sums to 322.4 cm (assuming totally erect hindlimb posture, > which of course is wrong). I can see where you'd add on a few extra > cm for the cartilaginous joints, but a whole 80 cm?
>> and please keep in mind that Senter and Robins (2010) assume less cartilage, > so you'd have to add some cm to *G.*, too. Assuming identical limb flexion
> angles in both taxa, *G.* stays taller. > :) > HeinrichI'd assume a bit more limb flexion in *G.*, though, because as an oviraptorosaur it probably had a shorter tail.