[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Haplocheirus, the alvarezsauroid that looked normal

To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: Haplocheirus, the alvarezsauroid that looked normal
From: Dann Pigdon <dannj@alphalink.com.au>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 15:03:25 +1100
Authentication-results: msg-ironport0.usc.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
In-reply-to: <1f4a892d1001281719p4faadb5dnbe77a2d1682c3029@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201001282007.AYM45318@md4.mail.umd.edu> <1f4a892d1001281719p4faadb5dnbe77a2d1682c3029@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: dannj@alphalink.com.au
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

On Fri, Jan 29th, 2010 at 12:19 PM, "T. Michael Keesey" <keesey@gmail.com> 
wrote:

> On a minor note, given all the grousing we do on this list about new
> dinosaurs' names, I have to say I rather like this one.

It's certainly kinder on the tongue than Bistahieversor.

-- 
_____________________________________________________________

Dann Pigdon
GIS Specialist                         Australian Dinosaurs
Melbourne, Australia               http://home.alphalink.com.au/~dannj
_____________________________________________________________

References:
- Haplocheirus, the alvarezsauroid that looked normal
  - From: "Thomas R. Holtz, Jr." <tholtz@umd.edu>
- Re: Haplocheirus, the alvarezsauroid that looked normal
  - From: "T. Michael Keesey" <keesey@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Haplocheirus, the alvarezsauroid that looked normal
Next by Date: Re: Haplocheirus does not confirm alvarezsaurs are maniraptoran
Previous by thread: Re: Haplocheirus, the alvarezsauroid that looked normal
Next by thread: Re: Haplocheirus, the alvarezsauroid that looked normal
Indexes: