[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Delicious Triceratops Goodness
Just in case there are ceratopsian buffs on this list who haven't noticed, this
paper is now out:
Fujiwara, Shin-Ichi. A Reevaluation of the Manus Structure in Triceratops
(Ceratopsia: Ceratopsidae). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 2009 29 (4),
1136-1147.
ABSTRACT: A Triceratops, NSM PV 20379, excavated from the Upper Cretaceous Hell
Creek Formation, Bowman County, North Dakota, USA, confirms the articulation of
the right forearm. Detailed study of the forelimb anatomy presented here
indicates the manus is in a semi-supinated orientation. This reconstruction is
based upon the following morphology: the row of the metacarpals was arranged in
an ‘L’-shape in proximal view, as is the distal articular surface of the
forearm is in articulation; the second digit is directed parallel to the
rotational plane of the elbow joint, reinforced by neighboring digits I and
III, and these three inner digits are articulated with the broad articular
surface of the radius. Arrangement and directions of robust inner digits seem
to be suitably arranged for a powerful stroke exerted by the elbow joint
extension. Cerapods, including ceratopsians and ornithopods, share following
morphology of the manus: long and robust metacarpals II and III, ungual
phalanges on digits I to III, reduced digits IV and V, and a divergent
metacarpal V. A laterally oriented manus with reduced outer digits is present
in the basal bipedal group of the Cerapoda. Although reversal to a quadrupedal
stance and a evolution to a large, heavy body occurred independently in many
lineages of Cerapoda, the basic features of the manus were retained throughout
Neoceratopsia.
This is an absolutely awesome paper. It confirms that *Triceratops* had
parasagittal rather than sprawling forelimbs; however, the new reconstruction
has little else in common with previous reconstructions. The manus is a whole
lot weirder than ever pictured before. Only the inner three fingers bear the
bulk of the animal's weight and they (the manus) are incapable of actual
pronation and thus the radius and ulna are uncrossed - among many, many other
things.
Seriously cool stuff.
P. S. I can send a copy of the paper to anyone interested, and thus return a
fragment of the many paper-giving favors done for me by other list members :)
~ Michael
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft’s powerful SPAM protection.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/177141664/direct/01/