[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Early angiosperms were weedy

To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: Early angiosperms were weedy
From: Dann Pigdon <dannj@alphalink.com.au>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 15:51:19 +1000
Authentication-results: msg-ironport1.usc.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
In-reply-to: <BLU115-W243EEE6A8D568511AF604EB9080@phx.gbl>
References: <BLU115-W243EEE6A8D568511AF604EB9080@phx.gbl>
Reply-to: dannj@alphalink.com.au
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

On Thu, Apr 22nd, 2010 at 3:45 PM, GUY LEAHY <xrciseguy@q.com> wrote:

> And dinosaur food, I suspect...
> 
> http://www.amjbot.org/cgi/content/abstract/97/3/438

What would that make early angioweeds then?

I'll get me coat...                               

-- 
_____________________________________________________________

Dann Pigdon
GIS Specialist                         Australian Dinosaurs
Melbourne, Australia               http://home.alphalink.com.au/~dannj
_____________________________________________________________

References:
- Early angiosperms were weedy
  - From: GUY LEAHY <xrciseguy@q.com>

Prev by Date: Early angiosperms were weedy
Next by Date: Re: Oxfordian vertebrates are poorly known all over the world?
Previous by thread: Early angiosperms were weedy
Next by thread: New exhibit at Smithsonian NMNH
Indexes: