[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
The cladogram from the supp. inf. of the *Anchiornis* paper
The recent Nature paper that finds *A.* as a troodontid has 52 pages of
supplementary information. For those who haven't downloaded it yet
(unlike some other journals, Nature does not put its supp. inf. behind a
paywall), I have retyped the cladogram (fig. S5) below.
First in general terms, because it's so large (87 taxa, 363 characters;
CI = 0.34):
--+--*Allosaurus fragilis*
`--+--*Sinraptor*
`--+--Tyrannosauroidea
`--+--Compsognathidae
`--+--Ornithomimosauria
`--+--*Ornitholestes*
`--+--Segnosauria
`--+--Alvarezsauridae
`--+--Oviraptorosauria
`--+--what they call Avialae
`--+--Troodontidae
`--Dromaeosauridae
The position of *Sinraptor* probably means that the outgroup was
erroneously restricted to *Allosaurus*. (If you don't designate an
outgroup, PAUP* uses the first OTU in the list as the outgroup.)
Then in detail:
Tyrannosauroidea
|--+--*Tanycolagreus*
| `--*Coelurus*
`--+--*Dilong*
`--+--*Eotyrannus*
`--+--*Tyrannosaurus*
`--*Gorgosaurus*
Jurassic tyrannosaurs all over the place, even though *Guanlong* and
*Proceratosaurus* are not in the matrix.
Compsognathidae
|--*Huaxiagnathus*
`--+--*Compsognathus*
`--*Sinosauropteryx*
Ornithomimosauria
|--*Harpymimus*
`--+--*Deinocheirus*
`--+--*Shenzhousaurus*
`--+--*Pelecanimimus*
`--+--*Garudimimus*
`--+--*Archaeornithomimus*
`--+--*Gallimimus*
`--+--*Struthiomimus*
`--+--*Anserimimus*
`--*Ornithomimus*
Weird positions for *Pelecanimimus* and *Anserimimus*.
Segnosauria
|--*Falcarius*
`--+--*Beipiaosaurus*
`--+--*Alxasaurus*
`--+--*Nothronychus*
|--*Erliansaurus*
|--*Nanshiungosaurus*
`--+--*Neimongosaurus*
`--+--*Segnosaurus*
`--+--*Erlikosaurus*
`--*Therizinosaurus*
Alvarezsauridae
|--*Alvarezsaurus*
`--+--*Patagonykus*
`--+--*Mononykus*
`--*Shuvuuia*
Perhaps a bit small, this taxon sample... but the biggest omission is
not the author's fault. I'll send the SVP abstract next: the place where
*Guanlong* and *Limusaurus* come from has now yielded an Oxfordian
alvarezsaurid.
Oviraptorosauria
|--*Caenagnathus*
|--*Avimimus*
|--+--*Protarchaeopteryx*
| `--*Incisivosaurus*
`--+--*Caudipteryx*
`--+--*Microvenator*
`--+--*Oviraptor*
`--+--+--+--*Khaan*
| | `--*Conchoraptor*
| `--+--*Ingenia*
| `--*Heyuannia*
`--+--+--*Rinchenia*
| `--IGM 100/42
`--+--*Citipati*
`--+--*Elmisaurus*
|--*Hagryphus*
`--*Chirostenotes*
*Caenagnathus* and *Chirostenotes* as far apart as at all possible! Wow.
Nice confirmation for the position of *Oviraptor* as the sister-group to
all other oviraptorids including "elmisaurids". Interesting confirmation
for the tendency of dinosaurologists to resist any lumping of sister
species into the same genus (*Incisivosaurus* is still there).
Avialae
|--+--*Epidendrosaurus*
| `--*Epidexipteryx*
`--+--+--*Archaeopteryx*
| `--*Wellnhoferia*
`--+--*Jeholornis*
`--+--*Sapeornis*
`--+--*Confuciusornis*
`--+--*Protopteryx*
`--*Yanornis*
Avialae is defined on page 2 of the supp. inf. as "the most inclusive
clade including Neornithes but not *Deinonychus antirrhopus* and
*Troodon formosus*". Aves is defined right below as "the least inclusive
clade including *Archaeopteryx* and Neornithes".
I still don't believe in *Wellnhoferia*. :-)
*Epidendrosaurus* probably includes *Scansoriopteryx*, and *Jeholornis*
*Shenzhouraptor*.
I wonder how much this topology can be trusted, because among the
autapomorphies of Avialae that *Anchiornis* lacks is "reversed hallux".
Ehem.
Troodontidae
|--*Sinovenator*
`--+--*Anchiornis*
`--+--*Mei*
`--+--*Byronosaurus*
`--+--*Sinornithoides*
|--IGM 100/44
`--+--*Troodon*
`--+--*Saurornithoides junior*
`--*S. mongoliensis*
Note that, although it is the oldest troodontid in this matrix and has
plesiomorphies like {widely spaced teeth except at the jaw tips},
*Anchiornis* is not the basalmost one. There are two ghost lineages high
up into the Early Cretaceous.
Dromaeosauridae
|--+--*Rahonavis*
| `--+--*Unenlagia*
| `--*Buitreraptor*
`--+--+--*Bambiraptor*
| `--+--*Sinornithosaurus*
| `--+--*Microraptor*
| `--NGM C91
`--+--*Adasaurus*
`--+--IGM 100/1015
`--+--+--*Velociraptor*
| `--*Saurornitholestes*
`--+--*Deinonychus*
`--+--*Atrociraptor*
`--+--*Achillobator*
`--+--*Dromaeosaurus*
`--*Utahraptor*
So *Deinonychus* is a dromaeosaurine, but *Adasaurus* is not... <head spins>
But at least *Rahonavis* is here to stay, 4 to 6 nodes away from
*Anchiornis*, *Archaeopteryx* and *Jeholornis*.