[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Herrerasaurus - a sauropodomorph, really?

To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: Herrerasaurus - a sauropodomorph, really?
From: evelyn sobielski <koreke77@yahoo.de>
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 14:20:47 +0000 (GMT)
Authentication-results: msg-ironport2.usc.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
In-reply-to: <4AC89F8E.7070700@gmx.at>
Reply-to: koreke77@yahoo.de
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

> Someone apparently afflicted with the Dunning-Kruger effect
> has introduced prominent mentions of cladistics (and even
> "cladism", a term that appears to have been deliberately
> coined to make a method look like an ideology) into the
> Wikipedia article on PN. I'll have to fix that.

Actually, Wikipedia has more on PN in the "Cladistics" article than in the PN 
article itself. It is a mess.

Eike

References:
- Re: Herrerasaurus - a sauropodomorph, really?
  - From: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>

Prev by Date: Re: Reverse-engineering a T. rex genome
Next by Date: seeking anatomical names for the parts of the metacarpal
Previous by thread: Re: Herrerasaurus - a sauropodomorph, really?
Next by thread: RE: Herrerasaurus - a sauropodomorph, really?
Indexes: