[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Herrerasaurus not a dino? BLASPHEMY!

To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: Herrerasaurus not a dino? BLASPHEMY!
From: Dann Pigdon <dannj@alphalink.com.au>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:58:22 +1100
Authentication-results: msg-ironport0.usc.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
In-reply-to: <d9c90da40911112018y344bb85fxe16c57edb811e2bd@mail.gmail.com>
References: <700652.17273.qm@web111603.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <d9c90da40911112018y344bb85fxe16c57edb811e2bd@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: dannj@alphalink.com.au
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

On Thu, Nov 12th, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Andy Grass <adgrass@gmail.com> wrote:

> There's blasphemy in science...?

Well, there were 'dinosaur heresies'... :-)

-- 
_____________________________________________________________

Dann Pigdon
GIS / Archaeologist                Australian Dinosaurs
Melbourne, Australia               http://home.alphalink.com.au/~dannj
_____________________________________________________________

References:
- Herrerasaurus not a dino? BLASPHEMY!
  - From: B tH <soylentgreenistrex@yahoo.com>
- Re: Herrerasaurus not a dino? BLASPHEMY!
  - From: Andy Grass <adgrass@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Herrerasaurus not a dino? BLASPHEMY!
Next by Date: Re: Herrerasaurus not a dino? BLASPHEMY!
Previous by thread: Re: Herrerasaurus not a dino? BLASPHEMY!
Next by thread: T. Rex fossil headed to Museum
Indexes: