[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Interpreting the autopodia of tetrapods:

To: dinosaur mailing list <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Interpreting the autopodia of tetrapods:
From: David Peters <davidpeters@att.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 15:39:14 -0600
Authentication-results: msg-ironport0.usc.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
Reply-to: davidpeters@att.net
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

Does anyone have a pdf of this paper that disses this nine-year-oldrarely cited hypothesis? Came out in September. I haven't seen it yet.

Hone, D.W.E., Sullivan, C., & Bennett, S.C. 2009. Interpreting theautopodia of tetrapods: interphalangeal lines hinge on too manyassumptions. Historical Biology, 21: 67-77.

Prev by Date: Postosuchus-a mixture of both?
Next by Date: Re: Postosuchus-a mixture of both?
Previous by thread: Re: Postosuchus-a mixture of both?
Next by thread: Ok..how bout Placerias?
Indexes: