There's still the bipedal reconstruction of Weinbaum (2002) or the composite one of Peyer et al. (2008), based on the holotype of *Postosuchus kirkpatricki* and *Postosuchus alisonae* and seemingly other specimens of *P. kirkpatricki* and/or rauisuchians. Weinbaum (2002): http://etd.lib.ttu.edu/theses/available/etd-07312008-31295017084608/ Peyer et al. (2008): http://www.ldgo.columbia.edu/~polsen/nbcp/peyer_et_al_08.pdf David Marjanovic a écrit :
BTW, I should had mentioned Alex Freeman's e-mail address: alex.freeman@bbc.co.uk. Unlike Outlook Express, Thunderbird is too stupid to automatically include that kind of information in a reply -- it just puts "[name] wrote:".I bet that no such thing has ever been done for *Repenomamus*, and I'm not sure about *Postosuchus* either (sure, there's Chatterjee's reconstruction, but it's not GSP-style, and it depicts a chimera).My mind is numb from googling, scanning papers and looking throughbooks. Its late. I have to CG model this thing. I need a good skeleton drawing. You know. Greg Paul Style. Oh yea...Rapenomamus would be great too.