[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Is the "K–T boundary" now the "K–Pg boundary" ?

To: oxytropidoceras@cox.net
Subject: Re: Is the "K–T boundary" now the "K–Pg boundary" ?
From: Mike Taylor <mike@indexdata.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 21:55:41 +0000
Authentication-results: msg-ironport0.usc.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
Cc: dinosaur@usc.edu
In-reply-to: <20091102161200.XPIWG.572530.imail@eastrmwml45>
References: <20091102161200.XPIWG.572530.imail@eastrmwml45>
Reply-to: mike@indexdata.com
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

2009/11/2  <oxytropidoceras@cox.net>:
> This means that that the "Tertiary" has been stripped of any status
> either official or informal in stratigraphic nomenclature.

It's impossible to strip a term of informal status.
--22_now_the_=22K=96Pg_boundary?=--

References:
- Is the "KâT boundary" now the "KâPg boundary" ?
  - From: <oxytropidoceras@cox.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Is the "KâT boundary" now the "KâPg boundary" ?
Next by Date: RE: Is the "K-T boundary" now the "K-Pg boundary" ?
Previous by thread: Is the "KâT boundary" now the "KâPg boundary" ?
Next by thread: RE: Is the "K-T boundary" now the "K-Pg boundary" ?
Indexes: