[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Darwin's young dead pet from Messel

To: david.marjanovic@gmx.at
Subject: Re: Darwin's young dead pet from Messel
From: Roberto Takata <rmtakata@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 19:00:54 -0300
Authentication-results: msg-ironport0.usc.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
Cc: DML <dinosaur@usc.edu>
In-reply-to: <B57C9A556C444360BDDC3B154051F24B@LENOVO>
References: <498826.29999.qm@web83703.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> <7C1F43CE-1AF6-4927-B485-21B50C00D1FA@jhmi.edu>
Reply-to: rmtakata@gmail.com
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 6:17 PM, David Marjanovic
<david.marjanovic@gmx.at> wrote:
> ...So, *Darwinius* and *Maiacetus* are nomina nuda as far as I can tell.

Well, PLoS has a printed version:
https://www.odysseypress.com/plosmedicine/plos_medicine_subscription.html
-------

[]s,

Roberto Takata

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Darwin's young dead pet from Messel
  - From: "T. Michael Keesey" <keesey@gmail.com>

References:
- Re: Prolacertiformes and Protorosauria
  - From: David Peters <davidpeters@att.net>
- Re: Prolacertiformes and Protorosauria
  - From: Mike Habib <habib@jhmi.edu>
- Re: Darwin's young dead pet from Messel
  - From: "David Marjanovic" <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>

Prev by Date: Re: Darwin's young dead pet from Messel
Next by Date: Re: opisthotic vs. ophisthotic
Previous by thread: Re: Darwin's young dead pet from Messel
Next by thread: Re: Darwin's young dead pet from Messel
Indexes: