[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

RE: Beishanlong grandis

To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: RE: Beishanlong grandis
From: Tim Williams <tijawi@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 19:11:54 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-results: msg-ironport1.usc.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
Reply-to: tijawi@yahoo.com
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

Thomas R. Holtz, Jr. <tholtz@umd.edu> wrote:

> > Just how big was this?  Deinocheirus size?
> > 
> 
> No where near. There are Gallimimus individuals bigger than
> Beishanlong.

Speaking of _Deinocheirus_, it was mentioned recently on the DML that new 
material of this beastie has been discovered.  Here's some background (although 
prepared to be disappointed if you're expecting any juicy details)...

http://palaeoblog.blogspot.com/2008/11/gobi-2008-deinocheirus.html

Prev by Date: Re: Series of articles on Nate Murphy
Next by Date: PDF request Galton 1971 Syntarsus
Previous by thread: RE: Beishanlong grandis
Next by thread: Is there (another) doctor in the house? Yes, Dr. Nesbitt!
Indexes: