[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Jurassic Park IV

To: "DML" <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Re: Jurassic Park IV
From: "David Marjanovic" <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 23:09:15 +0200
Authentication-results: msg-ironport2.usc.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
References: <776913.18739.qm@web88002.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <COL104-W50FA0D274AEC7D2116E501EB380@phx.gbl> <COL104-W428651268B6A9B1763FEC2EB380@phx.gbl>
Reply-to: david.marjanovic@gmx.at
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

I only read the first book but you know spielberg still did a pretty good job on the second film...anyway, there aren't that many films about dinosaurs that are actually entertaining (except if you count documentaires like walking with dinosaurs) so why insult the two good ones we have?

I didn't say the second one was _bad_. I said you were not really right when you counted it among _"the ones based on the books"_.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Jurassic Park IV
  - From: "T. Michael Keesey" <keesey@gmail.com>

References:
- Re: Jurassic Park IV
  - From: MICHAEL MURPHY <4mjmu@rogers.com>
- RE: Jurassic Park IV
  - From: Tobi Hautekiet <darth_tobi@hotmail.com>
- RE: Jurassic Park IV
  - From: Tobi Hautekiet <darth_tobi@hotmail.com>

Prev by Date: RE: Jurassic Park IV
Next by Date: Re: New Maderson feather paper
Previous by thread: RE: Jurassic Park IV
Next by thread: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Indexes: