[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Pterosaur Species List updates
- To: dinosaur@usc.edu
- Subject: Re: Pterosaur Species List updates
- From: Mike Hanson <mhanson54@comcast.net>
- Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 16:13:21 +0000 (UTC)
- Authentication-results: msg-ironport0.usc.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
- In-reply-to: <565354939.6680631245600781166.JavaMail.root@sz0043a.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net>
- Reply-to: mhanson54@comcast.net
- Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu
Basically a nomen dubium has a non-diagnostic type specimen, but there is
another species with a diagnostic type specimen which the nomen dubium may very
likely if not almost certainly belong to. The species with the diagnostic type
specimen cannot reasonably be synonymised with a species with a non-diagnostic
type, but to spare us the insanity of dealing with a pesky nomen dubium always
getting in the way it is lumped into the the species with the diagnostic type
species. It is not my invention, there are others out there who have done this
before and with great frequency. I know, it may be bending the rules quite a
bit.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Mortimer" <mickey_mortimer111@msn.com>
To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Sent: Sunday, 21 June, 2009 17:35:54 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Bern /
Rome / Stockholm / Vienna
Subject: RE: Pterosaur Species List updates
Mike Hanson wrote-
> Avgodectes and its synonyms are now listed as synonymous with Yixianopterus,
> though this requires some nomenclatural gymnastics, Avgodectes is now a nomen
> dubium.
How does this work? By definition, a nomen dubium cannot be a synonym, because
in order to be a nomen dubium, it would have to be indistinguishable from at
least two species, so couldn't be a definite synonym of either.
Mickey Mortimer