[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Privately-Owned Alioramus

To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: Privately-Owned Alioramus
From: quailspg@frii.com
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 23:38:14 -0600 (MDT)
Authentication-results: msg-ironport2.usc.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
In-reply-to: <347694158.15891243990004798.JavaMail.root@mail.mcdaniel.edu>
References: <347694158.15891243990004798.JavaMail.root@mail.mcdaniel.edu>
Reply-to: quailspg@frii.com
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

Adam Pritchard wrote:

> Regardless of the debate on private collecting,
> I just thought it would be a good idea to put the
> word out that more remains attributed to Alioramus
> exist.  I also hoped that someone might shed
> light on the mention of more Alioramus skulls
>  Are any of these in the hands of museums or
> paleo-friendly institutions?

Wasn't there a skull on display (or for sale?) at the Denver Gem & Mineral
Show/Fossil Expo last year -- or maybe a couple years ago? Mary, didn't I
send you a photo of that?

-- Donna Braginetz

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Privately-Owned Alioramus
  - From: "Thomas R. Holtz, Jr." <tholtz@umd.edu>

References:
- Privately-Owned Alioramus
  - From: acp002@mcdaniel.edu

Prev by Date: Re: Privately-Owned Alioramus
Next by Date: Rhachiocephalus papers
Previous by thread: Re: Privately-Owned Alioramus
Next by thread: Re: Privately-Owned Alioramus
Indexes: