[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Vancleavea campi - what is it? - not an archosauriform.

To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: Vancleavea campi - what is it? - not an archosauriform.
From: B tH <soylentgreenistrex@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 18:17:26 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-results: msg-ironport0.usc.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
In-reply-to: <52659.69.255.167.54.1260048865.squirrel@hockeyboys.umd.edu>
Reply-to: soylentgreenistrex@yahoo.com
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

And a radioactive one, at that!   lol
Good 50's flick, tho.


--- On Sat, 12/5/09, Thomas R. Holtz, Jr. <tholtz@umd.edu> wrote:
> 
> No, that's a Brachiosaurus. Really. That's what they say in
> the movie...
>

References:
- Re: Vancleavea campi - what is it? - not an archosauriform.
  - From: "Thomas R. Holtz, Jr." <tholtz@umd.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: Vancleavea campi - what is it? - not an archosauriform.
Next by Date: RE: Differences between *Vancleavea* and thalattosaurs
Previous by thread: Re: Vancleavea campi - what is it? - not an archosauriform.
Next by thread: Peters, Vancleavea, Pterosaurs, Photoshop....
Indexes: