[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Vancleavea campi - what is it? - not an archosauriform.

To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: Vancleavea campi - what is it? - not an archosauriform.
From: B tH <soylentgreenistrex@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 12:28:14 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-results: msg-ironport0.usc.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
In-reply-to: <E440EB5E-E5A0-4A19-9AF9-46A074E21F56@att.net>
Reply-to: soylentgreenistrex@yahoo.com
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

But what if it is 
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_KZ_ozC-ZxC0/Ro98oZEqJGI/AAAAAAAAA2Y/YK2i-DaCApA/s400/behemoth4.jpg
 ?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Vancleavea campi - what is it? - not an archosauriform.
  - From: "Thomas R. Holtz, Jr." <tholtz@umd.edu>

References:
- Re: Vancleavea campi - what is it? - not an archosauriform.
  - From: David Peters <davidpeters@att.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Vancleavea campi - what is it? - not an archosauriform.
Next by Date: RE: Differences between *Vancleavea* and thalattosaurs
Previous by thread: Re: Vancleavea campi - what is it? - not an archosauriform.
Next by thread: Re: Vancleavea campi - what is it? - not an archosauriform.
Indexes: