[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Campbell's even crazier than a MANIAC? (archeopteryx climbing)

To: mhabib5@jhmi.edu
Subject: Re: Campbell's even crazier than a MANIAC? (archeopteryx climbing)
From: jrc <jrccea@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 08:14:04 -0600
Cc: dinosaur@usc.edu
References: <DA5FAEB9-8C58-11DD-86D5-000393BA24D4@jhmi.edu>
Reply-to: jrccea@bellsouth.net
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Habib" <mhabib5@jhmi.edu> To: <dinosaur@usc.edu> Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 11:55 PM Subject: Re: Campbell's even crazier than a MANIAC? (archeopteryx climbing)

No worries. Actually, I consider the origin for pterosaurs to be currently equivocal, as do most pterosaur workers. It is completely plausible that arboreality could have been involved - but it didn't have to be.

This has been my point as well. As usual, Mike and I are in pretty close agreement. JimC

References:
- Re: Campbell's even crazier than a MANIAC? (archeopteryx climbing)
  - From: Michael Habib <mhabib5@jhmi.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: Campbell's even crazier than a MANIAC? (archeopteryx climbing)
Next by Date: Fw: Re: Campbell's even crazier than a MANIAC? (archeopteryx climbing)
Previous by thread: Re: Campbell's even crazier than a MANIAC? (archeopteryx climbing)
Next by thread: Re: Campbell's even crazier than a MANIAC? (archeopteryx climbing)
Indexes: