[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Triassic dinosaur evolution

To: danchure@easilink.com
Subject: Re: Triassic dinosaur evolution
From: Nick Pharris <npharris@umich.edu>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 02:48:21 -0400
Cc: dannj@alphalink.com.au, dinosaur@usc.edu
In-reply-to: <48D2EA3D.6000508@easilink.com>
References: <48D13033.52DE.0035.0@port.ac.uk> <450383.72724.qm@web50812.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <48D0FD81.11DB.00D7.0@ipfw.edu>
Reply-to: npharris@umich.edu
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

Quoting Dan Chure <danchure@easilink.com>:

And if one can't fathom the relationships of a group such as the (invertebrate) Tardigrada, elevate it to a Phylum.

Sounds perfectly reasonable to me, considering that's essentially the definition of a "phylum".

--Nick Pharris

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Triassic dinosaur evolution
  - From: Augusto Haro <augustoharo@gmail.com>

References:
- Re: Triassic dinosaur evolution
  - From: Mark Witton <Mark.Witton@port.ac.uk>
- Re: Triassic dinosaur evolution
  - From: Dan Chure <danchure@easilink.com>

Prev by Date: RE: Triassic dinosaur evolution
Next by Date: RE: Campbell's even crazier than a MANIAC? (archeopteryx climbing)
Previous by thread: Re: Triassic dinosaur evolution
Next by thread: Re: Triassic dinosaur evolution
Indexes: