[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: it's back!

To: DML <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Re: it's back!
From: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 21:32:22 +0200
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58L0.0810221018050.26872@zipcon.net>
Reply-to: david.marjanovic@gmx.at
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

So it got published without any further peer-review...? I'll have to read the paper, but so far it looks like none of the comments made on this list were taken into account.

Follow-Ups:
- RE: it's back!
  - From: "Thomas R. Holtz, Jr." <tholtz@umd.edu>

References:
- it's back!
  - From: Ian Paulsen <birdbooker@zipcon.net>