[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Argumentum ad hominem was Re: Michael Crichton dies

To: DML <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Re: Argumentum ad hominem was Re: Michael Crichton dies
From: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 23:18:12 +0100
References: <67805.22876.qm@web52909.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
Reply-to: david.marjanovic@gmx.at
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

Wouldn't that be considered an appeal to authority instead?


I'd say all arguments from authority are argumenta ad hominem.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Argumentum ad hominem was Re: Michael Crichton dies
  - From: Augusto Haro <augustoharo@gmail.com>

References:
- Re: Argumentum ad hominem was Re: Michael Crichton dies
  - From: Jura <pristichampsus@yahoo.com>

Prev by Date: My name is Sue, how do you do?
Next by Date: Re: Dinosaur whodunit: Solving a 77-million-year-old mystery
Previous by thread: Re: Argumentum ad hominem was Re: Michael Crichton dies
Next by thread: Re: Argumentum ad hominem was Re: Michael Crichton dies
Indexes: