[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: NASA Mars mission funding - better spent on paleo?

To: hammeris1@bellsouth.net
Subject: Re: NASA Mars mission funding - better spent on paleo?
From: Scott Robert Ladd <scott.ladd@coyotegulch.com>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 13:49:40 -0400
Cc: dinosaur@usc.edu
In-reply-to: <052420081249.7414.48380ED50009215800001CF622243429029B0A02D2089B9A019C04040A0DBFCE9C079D0A03030E08@att.net>
References: <052420081249.7414.48380ED50009215800001CF622243429029B0A02D2089B9A019C04040A0DBFCE9C079D0A03030E08@att.net>
Reply-to: scott.ladd@coyotegulch.com
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

Tread very carefully when implying that one field of intellectual study is more deserving than another... I can find quite a few people who would just as soon not "waste" money on digging up old bones. :)

Seeking knowledge is usually a good thing. It's killing people for stupid political reasons that we need to rail against, not sending probes to Mars.

..Scott Robert Ladd

References:
- NASA Mars mission funding - better spent on paleo?
  - From: hammeris1@bellsouth.net

Prev by Date: Attack of the Killer New Papers
Next by Date: Re: NASA Mars mission funding - better spent on paleo?
Previous by thread: RE: NASA Mars mission funding - better spent on paleo?
Next by thread: Re: NASA Mars mission funding - better spent on paleo?
Indexes: