[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: NASA Mars mission funding - better spent on paleo?

To: ptnorton <ptnorton@suscom-maine.net>
Subject: Re: NASA Mars mission funding - better spent on paleo?
From: jrc <jrccea@bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 00:48:14 -0600
Cc: dinosaur@usc.edu
References: <052420081249.7414.48380ED50009215800001CF622243429029B0A02D2089B9A019C04040A0DBFCE9C079D0A03030E08@att.net>
Reply-to: jrccea@bellsouth.net
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

They deployed OK, and the first photos were fabulous. My heart is still going pitty-pat. JimC

----- Original Message ----- From: "ptnorton" <ptnorton@suscom-maine.net> To: <jrccea@bellsouth.net>; <danchure@easilink.com> Cc: <dinosaur@usc.edu> Sent: Sunday, May 25, 2008 6:00 PM Subject: Re: NASA Mars mission funding - better spent on paleo?

Amazing stuff, no doubt. Let's hope solar panels deploy OK and the that the little bugger can get to work!

Follow-Ups:
- RE: NASA Mars mission funding - better spent on paleo?
  - From: GUY LEAHY <xrciseguy@q.com>

References:
- NASA Mars mission funding - better spent on paleo?
  - From: hammeris1@bellsouth.net

Prev by Date: Re: NASA Mars mission funding - better spent on paleo?
Next by Date: Re: Publication dates and dinosaur genera and species for 2008
Previous by thread: Re: NASA Mars mission funding - better spent on paleo?
Next by thread: RE: NASA Mars mission funding - better spent on paleo?
Indexes: