[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Loricatosaurus priscus

To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: Loricatosaurus priscus
From: Dann Pigdon <dannj@alphalink.com.au>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 09:09:08 +0930
In-reply-to: <2891556F686C53418F210F7D93DFBBA62976AC@ucixs78.uci.cu>
References: <051920080539.7795.4831129600085B7B00001E732206424413CBCA02019C020E0803@comcast.net>
Reply-to: dannj@alphalink.com.au
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

Yasmani Ceballos Izquierdo writes:

?

I believe the answer is '42'. Now to figure out the question... :)

___________________________________________________________________

Dann Pigdon
GIS / Archaeologist              http://geo_cities.com/dannsdinosaurs
Melbourne, Australia             http://heretichides.soffiles.com
___________________________________________________________________

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Loricatosaurus priscus
  - From: Anthony Docimo <keenir@hotmail.com>

References:
- Re: Pterosaurs from 2000 to present
  - From: mhanson54@comcast.net (Mike Hanson)
- Loricatosaurus priscus
  - From: Yasmani Ceballos Izquierdo <yceballos@estudiantes.uci.cu>

Prev by Date: Re: Aquatic ceratopsians and such
Next by Date: RE: Loricatosaurus priscus
Previous by thread: Loricatosaurus priscus
Next by thread: RE: Loricatosaurus priscus
Indexes: