[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: smallest ANCIENT non-bird dinosaur - was what I was asking

To: DML <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Re: smallest ANCIENT non-bird dinosaur - was what I was asking
From: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>
Date: Thu, 08 May 2008 20:07:10 +0200
References: <8CA79BABF7428F4-12C-DEF@webmail-nc20.sysops.aol.com> <4819ED3E.3010909@gmail.com> <00a501c8aba9$99c42350$e90e10ac@LENOVO>
Reply-to: david.marjanovic@gmx.at
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

Catching up with the backlog...

----- Original Message -----
From: "Adam" <adam@crowlspace.com>
To: "Dinosaur Mailing List" <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Re: smallest ANCIENT non-bird dinosaur - was what I was asking

I've had interesting reactions when trying to
explain how 10% of all the people alive 1,000 years ago became ancestors
to everyone alive, and 90% didn't. That kind of shocks people.

Is it even true? Or are you only talking about mitochondria or Y chromosomes?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: smallest ANCIENT non-bird dinosaur - was what I was asking
  - From: "T. Michael Keesey" <keesey@gmail.com>

References:
- Re: smallest ANCIENT non-bird dinosaur - was what I was asking
  - From: dinoboygraphics@aol.com
- Re: smallest ANCIENT non-bird dinosaur - was what I was asking
  - From: John Conway <john.a.conway@gmail.com>
- Re: smallest ANCIENT non-bird dinosaur - was what I was asking
  - From: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>

Prev by Date: "Aztec Rex" - this Saturday night on TV
Next by Date: Re: smallest ANCIENT non-bird dinosaur - was what I was asking
Previous by thread: Re: smallest ANCIENT non-bird dinosaur - was what I was asking
Next by thread: Re: smallest ANCIENT non-bird dinosaur - was what I was asking
Indexes: