[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: what is the best and/or std nomenclature for ...

To: david.marjanovic@gmx.at
Subject: Re: what is the best and/or std nomenclature for ...
From: John Conway <john.a.conway@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 01 May 2008 17:34:44 +0100
Cc: DML <dinosaur@usc.edu>
In-reply-to: <009e01c8aba8$58dea1e0$e90e10ac@LENOVO>
References: <050120081619.14547.4819ED9F000A575B000038D322216128369B0A02D2089B9A019C04040A0DBFCE9C079D0A03030E08@att.net>
Reply-to: john.a.conway@gmail.com
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

David Marjanovic wrote:

Or, to be more precise, I guess I'd like a term to describe the period of the appearance of what is known as "dinosaur" in the mid-Triassic ---> end of Cretaceous.
There isn't one -- it would overlap the Triassic rather than in- or exclude all of it, and that's not how it's done.


How about "Age of Dinosaurs"? No fuss, no muss.

--
Palaeontography: http://palaeo.jconway.co.uk

References:
- what is the best and/or std nomenclature for ...
  - From: hammeris1@bellsouth.net
- Re: what is the best and/or std nomenclature for ...
  - From: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>

Prev by Date: Re: what is the best and/or std nomenclature for ...
Next by Date: Re: smallest ANCIENT non-bird dinosaur - was what I was asking
Previous by thread: Re: what is the best and/or std nomenclature for ...
Next by thread: Re: what is the best and/or std nomenclature for ...
Indexes: