[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: smallest ANCIENT non-bird dinosaur - was what I was asking

To: DML <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Re: smallest ANCIENT non-bird dinosaur - was what I was asking
From: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>
Date: Thu, 01 May 2008 15:37:12 +0200
References: <050120081248.8499.4819BC00000920470000213322218865869B0A02D2089B9A019C04040A0DBFCE9C079D0A03030E08@att.net>
Reply-to: david.marjanovic@gmx.at
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

so, does Microraptor still rule?

If you cut off the birds, yes. How much sense that makes is anyone's guess, though; it's not even clear if *Microraptor* was flightless.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: smallest ANCIENT non-bird dinosaur - was what I was asking
  - From: "T. Michael Keesey" <keesey@gmail.com>

References:
- smallest ANCIENT non-bird dinosaur - was what I was asking
  - From: hammeris1@bellsouth.net

Prev by Date: smallest ANCIENT non-bird dinosaur - was what I was asking
Next by Date: Re: smallest ANCIENT non-bird dinosaur - was what I was asking
Previous by thread: smallest ANCIENT non-bird dinosaur - was what I was asking
Next by thread: Re: smallest ANCIENT non-bird dinosaur - was what I was asking
Indexes: