[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: early tetrapod

To: DML <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Re: early tetrapod
From: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:33:47 +0200
References: <245639.66891.qm@web63808.mail.re1.yahoo.com> <007901c8d709$c2a4b1f0$0400a8c0@LENOVO>
Reply-to: david.marjanovic@gmx.at
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

Is that clear? Near as I can find out online, they're both Upper
Famennian - is it possible to determine relative age more precisely
than that?

Yes, and AFAIK *Ventastega* is a bit older -- but I don't have any of the refs here.

References:
- early tetrapod
  - From: Erik Boehm <erikboehm07@yahoo.com>
- Re: early tetrapod
  - From: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>

Prev by Date: Re: early tetrapod
Next by Date: Re: origin of bats/reply 2 to TMK
Previous by thread: Re: early tetrapod
Next by thread: Re: early tetrapod
Indexes: