Tested against _all_ prior contenders, civets/Ptilocercus/and a fossil rostrum (can't recall name) come closest, so the uncertainty is reduced. If you saw what I saw in the skeletons, you'd be on board.
Chalicotheres and anteaters, also knuckle walkers, may have just one day decided to "save their nails." I don't know about how they changed patterns. Were some small and arboreal?
Anteaters, yes: most are still small and arboreal.
Either way, it's a single, fairly simple shift on the tree, so phylogenetic parsimony is probably not the best way to judge the likelihood of the proposed launch system.
Never discount phylogenetics. It's the key you're trying to ignore because it doesn't fit your paradigm.
Shake off all prejudices and let the phylogenetic evidence guide you. It's real. It's not made up by engineers.
I brought up short-legged, long-handed Nyctosaurus because it would seem it was operating with oversize "crutches" that would not have been able to be angled at a posterior vector for a quad launch that sent the pterosaur forward.
Silver bullets: