[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: No Jurassic Park IV

To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: No Jurassic Park IV
From: "T. Michael Keesey" <keesey@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2008 09:05:27 -0800
In-reply-to: <320695.34273.qm@web51801.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
References: <8CB276ACA1C419C-148C-10F9@WEBMAIL-MY17.sysops.aol.com> <320695.34273.qm@web51801.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
Reply-to: keesey@gmail.com
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 11:23 PM, Paul Penkalski <turtlecroc@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Jurassic Park 3 was the best of the three. It's rare for sequels
> to be better than their prequels, but JP3 was just a better put
> together flick than JP or especially TLW-JP2. I'm keeping my
> fingers crossed for a JP4.....

How could that one be the best? They didn't even finish the movie!
-- 
T. Michael Keesey
Technical Consultant and Developer, Internet Technologies
Glendale, California

Follow-Ups:
- Re: No Jurassic Park IV
  - From: dinoboygraphics@aol.com
- Re: No Jurassic Park IV
  - From: Mesozoico Web <info@mesozoico.com.ar>

References:
- No Jurassic Park IV
  - From: mkirkaldy@aol.com
- Re: No Jurassic Park IV
  - From: Paul Penkalski <turtlecroc@yahoo.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Dinosaur Symposium in Fukui 2008 Abstracts free to download
Next by Date: Re: No Jurassic Park IV
Previous by thread: Re: No Jurassic Park IV
Next by thread: Re: No Jurassic Park IV
Indexes: