Re: Oryctos is back

[David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>]

> Give Senter 2005 another careful read. He got very few things right with 
> regard to Coelurosauravus and Longisquama. The parietal "bumps" he employs 
> as a synapomorphy linking the two are not the parietal in either taxon, 
> for instance.

Where are they then?

Why do you never publish your revolutionary new interpretations? They could 
make lots of nice little papers that would give you a nice long publication 
list, and that would enable us to actually evaluate them.