[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: mesosaurs & pareiasaurs

To: DML <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Re: mesosaurs & pareiasaurs
From: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 11:35:35 +0200
References: <DDE3636B-F46A-4ACA-9D7C-9575E183087D@att.net>
Reply-to: david.marjanovic@gmx.at
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

If this is true, I'll eat my shorts.

For what value of "true"? A certain bootstrap support? A certain number of steps by which this arrangement (Sauropsida consisting of Proganosauria and Romeriida) is more parsimonious than any alternative? You see, I plan to put all three mesosaurs (*Mesosaurus*, *Stereosternum*, *Brazilosaurus* -- all monospecific) into the analysis in my thesis as OTUs.

Cotton is protein, right?

References:
- mesosaurs & pareiasaurs
  - From: David Peters <davidpeters@att.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Rapid Lizard Evo
Next by Date: question about Longisquama plumes
Previous by thread: RE: mesosaurs & pareiasaurs
Next by thread: [no subject]
Indexes: