[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

re: birds and dinosaurs

To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: re: birds and dinosaurs
From: evelyn sobielski <koreke77@yahoo.de>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 06:44:46 +0200 (CEST)
In-reply-to: <041420080348.24099.4802D41000029FA400005E2322230647629B0A02D2089B9A019C04040A0DBFCE9C079D0A03030E08@att.net>
Reply-to: koreke77@yahoo.de
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

--- hammeris1@bellsouth.net schrieb:

> Okay, sloppy talk, but in every current schoolbook
> in the K12,
> TODAY, birds are not classified as reptiles . . .
> If dinosaurs are reptiles, do we need to update all
> the textbooks ASAP?

Technically, there is no such thing as a "reptile".
Regarding birds - had Clausewitz been a biologist,
he'd have said they are "a continuation of dinosaurs
by other means".


Eike


      __________________________________________________________
Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail.
Der Lieblings-Mailbox der Welt.
http://de.overview.mail.yahoo.com

References:
- re: birds and dinosaurs
  - From: hammeris1@bellsouth.net

Prev by Date: Re: birds and dinosaurs
Next by Date: Re: tweet-tweet
Previous by thread: Re: birds and dinosaurs
Next by thread: Re: birds and dinosaurs
Indexes: