[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: was Ophiacodon the best?

To: DML <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Re: was Ophiacodon the best?
From: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 22:02:53 +0200
References: <BLU115-W7E20E2DAF7EFDDB9F27DAB9F40@phx.gbl> <BLU121-W7E6CCD90ACDFD21DDD1F8D1F40@phx.gbl>
Reply-to: david.marjanovic@gmx.at
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

Conrad, J & C Sidor (2001), Re-evaluation of Tetraceratops insignis
(Synapsida: Sphenacodontia). J. Vert. Paleontol. 21: 42A (abstract).

Oh, so it's just an abstract that never got published. I'll read it tomorrow. Thanks!

References:
- Pachycephalosaurs could really knock heads...
  - From: GUY LEAHY <xrciseguy@q.com>
- was Ophiacodon the best?
  - From: Anthony Docimo <keenir@hotmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Like New Papers for Chocolate
Next by Date: Baryonyx papers ?
Previous by thread: RE: was Ophiacodon the best?
Next by thread: Re: was Ophiacodon the best?
Indexes: