[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: was Ophiacodon the best?

To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: was Ophiacodon the best?
From: Andreas Johansson <andreasj@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 13:23:42 +0200
In-reply-to: <001b01c894af$23030fd0$e90e10ac@LENOVO>
References: <BLU115-W7E20E2DAF7EFDDB9F27DAB9F40@phx.gbl> <BLU121-W7E6CCD90ACDFD21DDD1F8D1F40@phx.gbl>
Reply-to: andreasj@gmail.com
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 12:48 PM, David Marjanovic
<david.marjanovic@gmx.at> wrote:
[snip]
> > I'm hoping for something that can lunch on a gorgonopsid.
> >
>
>  There ain't no gorgonopsid in the Early Permian. There weren't any
> therapsids in the Early Permian, except *Tetraceratops*.

Conrad & Sidor argued in 2001 that *Tetraceratops* was actually a
sphenacodontid. Has this been overturned?

-- 
Andreas Johansson

Why can't you be a non-conformist just like everybody else?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: was Ophiacodon the best?
  - From: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>

References:
- Pachycephalosaurs could really knock heads...
  - From: GUY LEAHY <xrciseguy@q.com>
- was Ophiacodon the best?
  - From: Anthony Docimo <keenir@hotmail.com>
- Re: was Ophiacodon the best?
  - From: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>

Prev by Date: Re: was Ophiacodon the best?
Next by Date: Re: was Ophiacodon the best?
Previous by thread: Re: was Ophiacodon the best?
Next by thread: Re: was Ophiacodon the best?
Indexes: