Re: Anatomical directions for decribing coracoids

[don ohmes <d_ohmes@yahoo.com>]

Yeah, I had sort of assumed that the "positively misleading" methods were 
excluded from Mike's list of choices ...

Don

----- Original Message ----
From: "Thomas R. Holtz, Jr." <tholtz@umd.edu>
To: d_ohmes@yahoo.com; dinosaur@usc.edu
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 9:14:18 AM
Subject: RE: Anatomical directions for decribing coracoids

> From: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu [mailto:owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu] 
> On Behalf Of don ohmes
> Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 9:12 AM
> To: dinosaur@usc.edu
> Subject: Re: Anatomical directions for decribing coracoids
> 
> 
> Asking as a dedicated retroactivist; is it useful to go w/ priority?
> 
> Don
> 

Not if it is positively misleading compared to the orientation of the
coracoid (that being the real source of the confusion).

Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
Email: tholtz@umd.edu    Phone: 301-405-4084
Office: Centreville 1216            
Senior Lecturer, Vertebrate Paleontology
Dept. of Geology, University of Maryland
http://www.geol.umd.edu/~tholtz/
Fax: 301-314-9661        

Faculty Director, Earth, Life & Time Program, College Park Scholars
http://www.geol.umd.edu/~jmerck/eltsite/
Fax: 301-405-0796

Mailing Address:    Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
            Department of Geology
            Building 237, Room 1117
            University of Maryland
            College Park, MD 20742 USA