[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: dracrorex and National Geographic

To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: dracrorex and National Geographic
From: Dann Pigdon <dannj@alphalink.com.au>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 10:39:54 +1030
In-reply-to: <450998.83187.qm@web27210.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
References: <450998.83187.qm@web27210.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
Reply-to: dannj@alphalink.com.au
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

Denver Fowler writes:

I find it pretty surprising that National Geographic would sit so behind the times like this.

You've obviously mistaken National Geographic for a professional peer-reviewed publication...

(*cough* Archaeoraptor *cough*).

___________________________________________________________________

Dann Pigdon
GIS / Archaeologist              geo cities.com/dannsdinosaurs
Melbourne, Australia             heretichides.soffiles.com
___________________________________________________________________

References:
- dracrorex and National Geographic
  - From: Denver Fowler <df9465@yahoo.co.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: dracrorex and National Geographic
Next by Date: Re: Marsupial forelimbs... or rather hindlimbs
Previous by thread: RE: dracrorex and National Geographic
Next by thread: Re: dracrorex and National Geographic
Indexes: