Re: Under a green sky

[mariusromanus@aol.com]

And lets not forget the simple fact that climate models that use only 
natural forcing and climate models that use only anthropogenic forcing 
do not produce accurate depictions of the current climate state/trend. 
In fact, they aren't even close to modeling the climate accurately.  It 
is only when natural and anthropogenic forcing is combined, do models 
produce results that are relatively close to being what we see in the 
real world. Please look over www.ipcc.ch for exactly what I am talking 
about. See the comparisons of modeled and observed temperature rises 
since 1860.

Other websites such as http://www.globalwarmingart.com/ have very 
clear-cut graphical dipictions of our current understanding.


Kris
Saurierlagen@gmail.com


-----Original Message-----
From: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>
To: DML <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Sent: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 1:15 pm
Subject: Re: Under a green sky


> I have a lot of trouble with the "man is at fault" (specifically, 
western > European and North American man, and more specifically US 
man) theory, > which is more politics than science.Â
Â
1. http://www.realclimate.orgÂ;
2. Don't you even notice that you're making an argument from ignorance? 
Remember, you have fallen among the scientists. Making argument from 
ignorance is just about the most embarrassing thing you can do. Â


________________________________________________________________________
Email and AIM finally together. You've gotta check out free AOL Mail! - 
http://mail.aol.com