[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Big Dinosaurs, Tiny Genomes

To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: Big Dinosaurs, Tiny Genomes
From: Jamie Stearns <stearns5@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:53:10 -0500
References: <20070308014727.41763.qmail@web82715.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <p06230925c215312c76cf@[192.168.123.184]>
Reply-to: stearns5@cox.net
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

Wow! It's not exactly measuring DNA, but at least some way of examining genetic makeup of fossil taxa. This could go a long way toward working out tricky cladistic stuff...

Anyhow, I'm eagerly awaiting a report on sauropodomorphs, if they can be cleared up. At the very least, this could help establish which of "Saurischia/Ornithischia" or "Theropoda/Phytodinosauria" is closer to the truth.

References:
- Big Dinosaurs, Tiny Genomes
  - From: Guy Leahy <xrciseguy@sbcglobal.net>
- Re: Big Dinosaurs, Tiny Genomes
  - From: Jeff Hecht <jeff@jeffhecht.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Big Dinosaurs, Tiny Genomes
Next by Date: Re: Big Dinosaurs, Tiny Genomes
Previous by thread: Re: Big Dinosaurs, Tiny Genomes
Next by thread: Re: Big Dinosaurs, Tiny Genomes
Indexes: