From: "Jaime A. Headden" <qilongia@yahoo.com>
Reply-To: qilongia@yahoo.com
To: simkoning@msn.com
CC: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: Carnivore Energetics: Why Are Lions Not As Big As Elephants?
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 20:13:39 -0800 (PST)
Sim Koning (simkoning@msn.com) wrote:
<Maybe I?m asking a dumb question, but if that?s the case, couldn?t
mammalian
predators evolve slower metabolic rates and achieve the same mass as a T.
rex?>
What is a slow predator but a prey food for something faster? Mammals
don't
currently need to get bigger to munch on the biggest herbivores, since in
many
cases, they compensate for having pack groups that increase success in
making
kills, and thus render size a non-issue. Further, large mammals avoid
predators
in size, but the downshot is that to do so, they decrease offspring
production,
and that is further offset by survivability of offspring. This is true even
of
whales and elephants, both of which are targeted prey choices.
Cheers,
Jaime A. Headden
http://bitestuff.blogspot.com/
"Innocent, unbiased observation is a myth." --- P.B. Medawar (1969)
____________________________________________________________________________________
Now that's room service! Choose from over 150,000 hotels
in 45,000 destinations on Yahoo! Travel to find your fit.
http://farechase.yahoo.com/promo-generic-14795097