[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

RE: Dinosaur mummies

To: yceballos@estudiantes.uci.cu
Subject: RE: Dinosaur mummies
From: Nick Pharris <npharris@umich.edu>
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2007 21:05:40 -0500
Cc: Seismosaurus@seznam.cz, dinosaur@usc.edu
In-reply-to: <E0D3E288DC0E744DA293F341A2FF927804FEC9C9@ucixs78.uci.cu>
References: <239.418-16380-1140424919-1196790230@seznam.cz> <E0D3E288DC0E744DA293F341A2FF927804FEC9C9@ucixs78.uci.cu>
Reply-to: npharris@umich.edu
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

Quoting Yasmani Ceballos Izquierdo <yceballos@estudiantes.uci.cu>:

What species "Dakota" represent?

Last I heard, they were still waiting to see if the head is preserved. Without the skull, it is difficult (if not impossible) to identify a hadrosaurid skeleton to species level.

--
Nick Pharris

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Dinosaur mummies
  - From: Guy Leahy <xrciseguy@sbcglobal.net>

References:
- Dinosaur mummies
  - From: Vladimír Socha <Seismosaurus@seznam.cz>
- RE: Dinosaur mummies
  - From: Yasmani Ceballos Izquierdo <yceballos@estudiantes.uci.cu>

Prev by Date: Re: This has to be seen to be believed
Next by Date: RE: Dinosaur mummies
Previous by thread: RE: Dinosaur mummies
Next by thread: RE: Dinosaur mummies
Indexes: