[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Dakota the Dinosaur Mummy

To: Dinosaur Mailing List <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Re: Dakota the Dinosaur Mummy
From: "T. Michael Keesey" <keesey@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2007 11:54:18 -0800
In-reply-to: <c8a.17014e21.3484637e@aol.com>
References: <c8a.17014e21.3484637e@aol.com>
Reply-to: keesey@gmail.com
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

On Dec 2, 2007 11:37 AM,  <MKIRKALDY@aol.com> wrote:
>
> "The fossilized duckbilled hadrosaur is so well preserved that  scientists
> have been able to calculate its muscle mass and learn that it was  more 
> muscular
> than thought, probably giving it the ability to outrun predators  such as a
> tyrannosaurus rex."

Wouldn't we need a mummified _Tyrannosaurus_ to be sure of that?

-- 
Mike Keesey

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Dakota the Dinosaur Mummy
  - From: ptnorton <ptnorton@suscom-maine.net>

References:
- Dakota the Dinosaur Mummy
  - From: MKIRKALDY@aol.com

Prev by Date: Dakota the Dinosaur Mummy
Next by Date: RE: Dakota the Dinosaur Mummy
Previous by thread: Dakota the Dinosaur Mummy
Next by thread: Re: Dakota the Dinosaur Mummy
Indexes: