[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Strange thoughts on PN - was Re: BAD vs. BADD

To: rmtakata@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Strange thoughts on PN - was Re: BAD vs. BADD
From: Mike Taylor <mike@indexdata.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 13:59:55 +0100
Cc: david.marjanovic@gmx.at, DML <dinosaur@usc.edu>
In-reply-to: <8b3c185c0608301720h6928b8abv5373f5f03ed0d6ad@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20060830213013.68838.qmail@web50805.mail.yahoo.com> <003201c6cc7c$5d273760$7f4efea9@gericom>
Reply-to: mike@indexdata.com
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

Roberto Takata writes:
 > On 8/30/06, David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at> wrote:
 > > How is "chicken" in any way incorrect? Chickens aren't paraphyletic.
 > 
 > Maybe they are *poly*phyletic.

No, but parrots are Pollyphyletic.

(I'll get my coat.)

 _/|_    ___________________________________________________________________
/o ) \/  Mike Taylor  <mike@miketaylor.org.uk>  http://www.miketaylor.org.uk
)_v__/\  "Microsoft is not the problem.  Microsoft is the symptom"  --
         Eric S. Raymond

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Strange thoughts on PN - was Re: BAD vs. BADD
  - From: Roberto Takata <rmtakata@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Bakker illustration of dinosaurs lost at war
Next by Date: Re: Bakker illustration of dinosaurs lost at war
Previous by thread: Re: Strange thoughts on PN - was Re: BAD vs. BADD
Next by thread: Re: Strange thoughts on PN - was Re: BAD vs. BADD
Indexes: