[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Essentialism and such (was a bunch of previous subject lines)

To: david.marjanovic@gmx.at
Subject: Re: Essentialism and such (was a bunch of previous subject lines)
From: Roberto Takata <rmtakata@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 21:49:43 -0200
Cc: DML <dinosaur@usc.edu>
In-reply-to: <006301c6fc72$5be148c0$0300a8c0@IPC>
References: <966101743728FC45BEC81A3E6E28FB9E11A6CF@DDASERVER.dwiggins.local> <006301c6fc72$5be148c0$0300a8c0@IPC>
Reply-to: rmtakata@gmail.com
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

On 10/30/06, David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at> wrote:

Then please explain this, on- or offlist.


Morphogenetic field is just a bunch of cell that give origin to a
adult structure. See, for example, Scott Gilbert's Developmental
Biology.

Rupert Sheldrake's morphic field is a non-scientific weird mistical conception.

[]s,

Roberto Takata

References:
- RE: Essentialism and such (was a bunch of previous subject lines)
  - From: Carl <Carl@dondwiggins.com>
- Re: Essentialism and such (was a bunch of previous subject lines)
  - From: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>

Prev by Date: Re: Lampreys Haven't Changed Much In 360 my
Next by Date: RE: Essentialism and such (was a bunch of previous subject lines)
Previous by thread: Re: Essentialism and such (was a bunch of previous subject lines)
Next by thread: RE: Essentialism and such (was a bunch of previous subject lines)
Indexes: