RE: Noasaurid relationships& reconstruction

[Tim Williams <twilliams_alpha@hotmail.com>]

> My questions are: Who decided Masiakasaurus knopfleri, Noasaurus leali, 
> Ligabueino andesi, Elaphrosaurus bambergi and Deltadromeus agilis were 
> related?

God?

;-)

Seriously, weren't most of the questions addressed in previous postings?

http://dml.cmnh.org/2006Oct/msg00229.html
http://dml.cmnh.org/2006Oct/msg00231.html

Anything more and I fear this would become the DML's senior project too.  
:-)



> From: Luis Perez <lmpm1234@verizonmail.com>
> Reply-To: lmpm1234@verizonmail.com
> To: dinosaur@usc.edu
> Subject: Noasaurid relationships& reconstruction
> Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 16:31:05 +0800
>
> The noasaurids and early abelisauroids are a group particularly hard to 
> understand due to the lack of material, but I still have many questions 
> regarding them due to the fact I'm working on my senior project and so on.
>
> My questions are: Who decided Masiakasaurus knopfleri, Noasaurus leali, 
> Ligabueino andesi, Elaphrosaurus bambergi and Deltadromeus agilis were 
> related?
Why (general idea + a little specifics?)? Are there any papers availible on 
this?
> Also concerning Noasaurs and dinosaur reconstructions in general, are there 
> any papers availible on Noasaurus 1980, Noasaurus now, how the 
> reconstruction's changed throughout the years, and if such papers aren't 
> availible, do any of you have any insight on this? Such help would be very 
> appreciated.
>
> Thanks
>
> Luis Perez
>
>
>
> --
>
> Search for products and services at:
> http://search.mail.com

_________________________________________________________________
All-in-one security and maintenance for your PC.  Get a free 90-day trial! 
http://clk.atdmt.com/MSN/go/msnnkwlo0050000002msn/direct/01/?href=http://www.windowsonecare.com/?sc_cid=msn_hotmail