Re: keller today @ gsa

[Tommy Tyrberg <tommy.tyrberg@norrkoping.mail.telia.com>]

At 14:43 2006-10-24, jbois@verizon.net wrote:

> Abstract at:
>
> http://gsa.confex.com/gsa/2006AM/finalprogram/abstract_113080.htm


She is the BAND equivalent of K/T-boundary research. I wonder how she 
explains the impact layer being "interbedded in undisturbed late 
Maastrichtian mudstone" about **5 crater diameters** away from the 
Chicxulub impact with just open sea in between? And where is the second 
crater? And why is there never any trace of multiple impacts away from the 
Mexican gulf where the stratigraphy was essentially bulldozed by the 
shockwave, ejecta curtain, tsunami plus seiches etc.
This is plain ridiculous.


Tommy Tyrberg