[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: when is a Lazarus Taxon not a Lazarus Taxon?

To: DML <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Re: when is a Lazarus Taxon not a Lazarus Taxon?
From: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2006 11:57:33 +0100
References: <BAY128-F39A74C0E225C9BDCCACC1BD1FC0@phx.gbl>
Reply-to: david.marjanovic@gmx.at
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

Imagine that a gorgonopsid fossil is found from the mid-Jurassic strata. If that were all that were unusual {the rock layer}, then it would be Lazarus Taxon. Right?

Right. No matter how odd it would be in terms of adaptations.

References:
- when is a Lazarus Taxon not a Lazarus Taxon?
  - From: Anthony Docimo <keenir@hotmail.com>

Prev by Date: Dracovenator regenti pdf or pics?
Next by Date: Re: when is a Lazarus Taxon not a Lazarus Taxon?
Previous by thread: when is a Lazarus Taxon not a Lazarus Taxon?
Next by thread: Re: when is a Lazarus Taxon not a Lazarus Taxon?
Indexes: