[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Cretaceous, yes -- Netherlands, yes -- marsupial, unlikely

To: david.marjanovic@gmx.at
Subject: Re: Cretaceous, yes -- Netherlands, yes -- marsupial, unlikely
From: K and T Dykes <ktdykes@arcor.de>
Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2006 09:51:41 +0100
Cc: dinosaur@usc.edu
References: <380-220051253017391484@M2W097.mail2web.com> <002f01c60f26$5ff1bdd0$a83cb23e@IPC>
Reply-to: ktdykes@arcor.de
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

<<Despite the phenetics, a phylogenetic analysis is done. *Nortedelphys*
(described a year earlier by the same authors) comes out as a
herpetotheriid.>>

That's not accurate, David.  /Nortedephys/ was established by Case JA, Goin
FJ & Woodburne MO, 2004.  Only one of the authors was involved in both
studies.

References:
- Cretaceous, yes -- Netherlands, yes -- marsupial, unlikely
  - From: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>

Prev by Date: Re: Cretaceous, yes -- Netherlands, yes -- marsupial, unlikely
Next by Date: Re: Cretaceous, yes -- Netherlands, yes -- marsupial, unlikely
Previous by thread: Re: Cretaceous, yes -- Netherlands, yes -- marsupial, unlikely
Next by thread: Re: Cretaceous, yes -- Netherlands, yes -- marsupial, unlikely
Indexes: