[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Strange thoughts on PN - was Re: BAD vs. BADD

To: david.marjanovic@gmx.at
Subject: Re: Strange thoughts on PN - was Re: BAD vs. BADD
From: Roberto Takata <rmtakata@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 21:20:46 -0300
Cc: DML <dinosaur@usc.edu>
In-reply-to: <003201c6cc7c$5d273760$7f4efea9@gericom>
References: <20060830213013.68838.qmail@web50805.mail.yahoo.com> <003201c6cc7c$5d273760$7f4efea9@gericom>
Reply-to: rmtakata@gmail.com
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

On 8/30/06, David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at> wrote:

How is "chicken" in any way incorrect? Chickens aren't paraphyletic.


Maybe they are *poly*phyletic.

[]s,

Roberto Takata

References:
- Re: Strange thoughts on PN - was Re: BAD vs. BADD
  - From: don ohmes <d_ohmes@yahoo.com>
- Re: Strange thoughts on PN - was Re: BAD vs. BADD
  - From: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>

Prev by Date: Re: Strange thoughts on PN - was Re: BAD vs. BADD
Next by Date: RE: BAD vs. BADD (was: Re: Most popular/common dinosaur misconceptions)
Previous by thread: Re: Strange thoughts on PN - was Re: BAD vs. BADD
Next by thread: Re: Strange thoughts on PN - was Re: BAD vs. BADD
Indexes: